Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thik Thik Thikil

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 11:31, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thik Thik Thikil[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Note User:Arnav19 has moved the article to an alternate spelling (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 13:21, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No clear notability. No results at Google Books or Google News. The only Google results I get provide no context. The only reference in the article results in a 403 error and there are no useful archives at the Wayback Machine. It's also curious that the article creator used an accessdate of 1997. I suspect the only way that notability can be established is through the inclusion of Tamil-language references. Maybe. This could also be a hoax for all I know. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 17:15, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 17:25, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. —SpacemanSpiff 17:48, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

comment As context, it should probably be noted that the article was created by someone who has been previously blocked for serial recreation of non notable articles [1] and the other major editor has been blocked as a sock of a user Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jaswanthvijay/Archive overly enthralled with TV shows on a particular network. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 13:39, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —☮JAaron95 ^Talk 18:01, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —☮JAaron95 ^Talk 14:22, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as there's simply nothing to suggest better improvement. SwisterTwister talk 05:39, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for lack or sources. As a brand new soap opera I would suspect that it is WP:TOOSOON even if it were to become popular later. --Bejnar (talk) 04:27, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.