Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thierry Laborde

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Sandstein 13:41, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thierry Laborde[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

My searches found nothing to suggest better improvement with the following being the best results, here, here, here and here. If you look at the history, you'll notice there was once more content but also unsourced and I suspect this has been edited by people close to him which is not a serious violation as long it's sourced and such...and this is not and there's no good move target. SwisterTwister talk 04:27, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 04:29, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 04:29, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 04:29, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 04:29, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:39, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep a Michelin starred chef, then there's this, this, this, this, this, this etc..... Kraxler (talk) 19:41, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - This was one of the closest I've looked at. I almost wanted to keep it based on WP:BASIC, but I don't think he quite gets over that hump. I think most of the cites provided by Kraxler are promotional. The fact that there is another person by this same name (the CEO of BNP Paribas Personal Finance) who gets a fair bit of press made researching a bit difficult. But for now I don't think he meets WP:GNG. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:40, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I can't follow your reasoning. What is promotional about articles in the Financial Times or the London Evening Standard? Kraxler (talk) 15:29, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —☮JAaron95 ^Talk 15:20, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.