Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thiago Santos (mixed martial arts)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:25, 18 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thiago Santos (mixed martial arts)[edit]
- Thiago Santos (mixed martial arts) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This individual does not meet the notability requirement of WP:MMANOT or WP:GNG. The article has no sources except for his fight record. Article was deprodded by a new user who appeared to apply the "Google test". The problem is that WP alone has 10 football (soccer) players with that name. I also found a developer, a model, a designer, and a streetsweeper with that name. I'm sure there are many others, so care has to be taken when searching. Astudent0 (talk) 17:43, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. —Astudent0 (talk) 17:43, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete He fails WP:MMANOT. Article also needs better references. 131.118.229.17 (talk) 18:16, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:42, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete This is basically an unsourced article about an MMA fighter who doesn't meet the notability criteria. Papaursa (talk) 02:11, 12 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- keepi've heard of him. i say he is a keeper! 149.68.97.25 (talk) 17:36, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Since you're a new user you might want to look at the AFD arguments to avoid. You've just used one of them. Astudent0 (talk) 17:16, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.