Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thermally Stimulated Current

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. W.marsh 23:57, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thermally Stimulated Current[edit]

Judging from the formatting, the author is little interested in an encyclopedic article, and it was only created to place a promotional link in the first place. Links to the company were also placed in other articles. Copyright problem, the content was taken from a website, by its owner who wants to release it, not verified. Speedy and prod were contested for that reason. Femto 15:53, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Widawski (talk · contribs) has already been told to stop adding links to his business on Wikipedia, and it appears he created this article as little more than a promotion write-up. -- Rynne 17:35, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Edison 00:32, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. The article as it stands is certainly a copy of another web page, which the creating editor claims to own (see the edit history). If they are willing to properly release the text, then I think it could be fashioned into a worthwhile article. If they don't release the text by the end of this discussion, it ought to go. Mr Stephen 16:42, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
keep. The article describing the technology was initially copy and paste from our website as new editor of this encyclopedia, but I will take the time to refashioned it in a "encyclopedic" article. The text contain the principle, use and benefit of the technology, as well as reference relevent to the content. I will add picture descriving principle of this technology as soon as I found out how I can do that!!! External link to our company manufacturing TSC analyser is not mandatory and should not be a cause of deletion. Similar external link to private company a available in many pages.

Widawski 17:10, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re-write This article is way too technical for the average layperson to understand. This is a general encyclopædia, not an encyclopædia of science. 69.140.173.15 17:43, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.