Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thergaon

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Yunshui ^雲 _水 08:03, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thergaon[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article should be deleted because it is too small and has no references to verify it. Additionally a quick web search shows that it might not be notable enough for a encylclopedia Abhinav0908 (talk) 19:07, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The article has been properly formatted and now has a citation to a reliable source. Thergoan is a former village, now a suburb of Pimpri-Chinchwad. In looking for sources one needs to distinguish between two former villages in Pune District with this name, this one Thergaon, Chinchwad, (postal code 411033) and Thergaon, Pune, (postal code 411019) which is now in Pune city. --Bejnar (talk) 21:53, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:00, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment one source alone isn't enough. An article needs at minimum multiple reliable third-party sources providing in-depth coverage to pass notability criteria. XXSNUGGUMSXX (talk) 07:10, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

There are multiple sources. Legally recognized, populated places, places with protected status (e.g. protected areas, national heritage, or cultural heritage), and named natural features with verifiable information beyond simple statistics are presumed to be notable. Wikipedia:Notability (geographic features). See also WP:NPLACE.

Keep, satisfied notability for human settlements, several google book hits on the existence of a paper mill there. Note that there are plenty of different Thergaons in Maharashtra, including a settlement in Nasik. --Soman (talk) 14:38, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, but I think a disambiguation page is warranted for here. Z10987 (talk) 01:36, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I think we should have a disambiguation page and the discussion must be closed keeping the page. Abhinav0908 (talk) 05:22, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.