Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Theo Stevenson

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Incubated. v/r - T P 14:43, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Theo Stevenson[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article is too short. No evidence of notability apart from few movies. Really not needed unless article can significantly be increased in size and notability can be established. Ruth-2013 (talk) 18:20, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 20:32, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

keep page will get more information when theo stevensons new film comes out the day after this AfD. I will work my hardest to try and find any references and info till then EastBelfastBoy (talk) 21:23, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: But surly wp:Crystal applies here. Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. We don't know whether or not the subject will become notable or not. Sure he will have had one famous movie how do we know he won't vanish after that. The page can be re created if he becomes notable. However my advice would be if you can find any references to help your case add them to the article now. But be advised not to remove the afd tag. Any extra references you could find would only help your case for a keep vote. The only other issue which has now come to light is the theo stevenson page was created by a user now banned for vandalism(Ruth-2013 (talk) 03:54, 25 July 2011 (UTC))[reply]
Comment: He has been active for 4 years and was in 3 other movies so he won't 'just disappear' after this movie. think of the millions of people who have created pages and are now banned for vandalism. EastBelfastBoy (talk) 11:42, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Incubate or Userfy as he IS getting a great deal of media coverage in England [1] for his starring role in Horrid Henry: The Movie. As the coverage exists in advance of the film being released, WP:CRYSTAL is far less applicable than is proper consideration of WP:GNG and WP:EVENT. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 04:43, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Incubate I now agree with this, I have just stumbled on press coverage for this person due to new movie, there is as of today seams like plenty to be going on with to make the article OK. While the article don't meat the high standards of wikipedia now because of coverage there is a possibility it could soon (Ruth-2013 (talk) 19:15, 25 July 2011 (UTC))[reply]
Strong speedy delete. This violates WP:CRYSTAL. It should only be created when a future event comes current. So I will request a strong and speedy delete to this one. StormContent (talk) 22:28, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It is about a person, not a future event. Chzz ► 05:26, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment From a quick look, there appear to be enough sources to show notability - [2] [3] [4] [5]. (I'm not certain enough to !vote, at this time, but perhaps these links will help others to improve it) Chzz ► 05:25, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 05:54, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Looks to have been in a few films. Szzuk (talk) 09:05, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

CommentSurely User:EastBelfastBoy vote on this deletion discussion should now not be counted as EastBelfastBoy has been blocked according to his userpage. Also this discussion should really be re listed after the current week runs out as someone messed about with the AFD tag at the top of the article. Because of this people may not have been able to find the AFD (Ruth-2013 (talk))

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.