Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Then falls caesar

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 13:41, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Then falls caesar[edit]

Non-notable band. Does not meet any criteria of WP:MUSICBIO. McWomble (talk) 07:56, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Meets Criteria: Has become the most prominent representative of a notable style or of the local scene of a city; note that the subject must still meet all ordinary Wikipedia standards, including verifiability. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Baggydj (talk • contribs) 08:02, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. And the reliable sources backing up that claim are.....? McWomble (talk) 08:07, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. Highest noncorrupted myspace page views and song plays of any band in local area. Therefore, Then Falls Caesar has become the most prominent representative of a notable style of local scene in city - Hillsborough, New Jersey.

http://myspace.com/thenfallscaesarnj —Preceding unsigned comment added by Baggydj (talk • contribs) 08:12, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. Myspace is not a reliable source. Falls under self-published sources, hence fails the verifiability policy. The threshold for inclusion in Wikipedia is verifiability, not truth. McWomble (talk) 08:22, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. Myspace's play counter is not a self-published source. Nor is its view counter. As such, these verifiable elements of myspace do not specifically fall under self-published source criteria. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.52.215.67 (talk) 08:32, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. A quick Google search turns up 1400+ hits, but almost all are social networking sites, forums or streaming music sites. I couldn't find any reliable sources to support a claim of notability. LinguistAtLarge 08:38, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 09:25, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, fails notability per WP:MUSIC. No reliable sources. Esradekan Gibb ^"Talk" 09:37, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: per LAL. Schuym1 (talk) 14:24, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete — This band has not toured at least statewide, which I'm pretty sure is actually the requirements for wp:music. Also, no reliable sources, and it doesn't seem that anyone is going to find any. - NuclearWarfare ^{contact me}_{My work} 16:41, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Band fails WP:MUSIC; it's only source appears to be the band's own Myspace, which is, let's face it, the least reliable source you can possibly use. No releases (barring the self-released demo), no significant coverage in independent, third party sources. You can tell people are getting desperate when they're referring to Myspace hit counters for notability. See WP:GARAGEBAND. Blackmetalbaz (talk) 17:02, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. -- Raven1977 (talk) 00:45, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:MUSIC on every point. sparkl_!sm ^hey! 08:57, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.