Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Theatre Workshop Scotland

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Cirt (talk) 14:31, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Theatre Workshop Scotland[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Request for a speedy deletion was made based on notability, and contested. There is one news article listed as a source. I am of No Opinion at this time. CitiCat^♫ 18:16, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. -- –Juliancolton | ^Talk 21:18, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- –Juliancolton | ^Talk 21:19, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this company. Joe Chill (talk) 21:31, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have added more references and information now. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sahrafilms (talk • contribs) 10:22, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions. Jonathan Oldenbuck (talk) 12:39, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I'm of the persuasion that all professional theatres should be considered notable, but that aside, I'd say the listings in the Scottish Arts Council, the listings in the Scotsman for best small theatres alongside the highly notable Traverse Theatre and their contribution to one highly successful film are enough. This is currently too much like a directory entry, and the details of "Troubled Sleeping" would be better placed in its own article, but this is all fixable. Chris Neville-Smith (talk) 11:57, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 00:27, 16 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep notable multi-award-winning workshop.--Sky Attacker the legend reborn... 06:15, 16 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep based on references to reliable third-party sources (Scottish Arts Council, The Scotsman, The Herald, BBC News) added by Sahrafilms. Jonathan Oldenbuck (talk) 12:12, 16 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.