Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The seal of Solomon in three dimensions - A fractal pattern for massive parallel architecture programs

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. snow delete SpinningSpark 16:49, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The seal of Solomon in three dimensions - A fractal pattern for massive parallel architecture programs[edit]

The seal of Solomon in three dimensions - A fractal pattern for massive parallel architecture programs (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable fractal. Only sources are articles by Christophe Roux, who may be connected to article creator Chris2refuge. Ahecht (TALK
PAGE
) 18:42, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Speedy DELETE - This is a blatant advertisement, which had been previously been speedy from his user page. Only reference is from the book itself and has no third party sources.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Mcmatter (talkcontribs) 18:55, 7 October 2014‎
  • Speedy Delete - No third-party sources to establish notability.--75* 21:11, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Snow delete. I don't think this fits any of the WP:CSD categories (the closest is G3, "blatant and obvious misinformation") but there's no need to wait out the full AfD period for such obvious crackpottery. —David Eppstein (talk) 21:17, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:43, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete' per above. There isn't enough coverage to really show notability for this concept and even if there was, it would still need to be re-written to really fit our editing guidelines. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 05:05, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • SNOW delete per David Eppstein. --Sammy1339 (talk) 05:37, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Quick note for the curious — if you got notified and can't figure out how, click this link; Sammy accidentally transcluded David Eppstein's userpage instead of linking it, so everyone whose username appears on David's userpage got notified. Nyttend (talk) 06:39, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
aaaah, that's a clever little trick then :) 12:27, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Comment - this one is so strange that I don't know what to do with it. Normally, for such trifles, I'd redirect it boldly to fractal, but it's not a likely search term. Bearian (talk) 12:47, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.