Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The mystery of Dante

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Nomination withdrawn (Non-admin closure). Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 22:52, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The mystery of Dante[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable film per WP:NFILM. Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 15:13, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn per added sources. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 22:52, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:27, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:27, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, a bunch of coverage in Italian sources (under its original title Il mistero di Dante), eg. [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9]. Cavarrone 06:04, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User:Cavarrone is quite correct:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Keep per multiple available Italian-language sources showing topic notability. I would urge the nominator to withdraw. While the article as first nominated was stubby, it need not remain so. Topic notability is dependent upon sources being available, and not upon their being used to cite a BRAND NEW ARTICLE. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 07:01, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Update: Sure, it's one thing for me to simply use a little RESEARCH and then declare a topic as notable, its a different animal to actually show it though regular editing. However, I do not understand how any diligent WP:BEFORE could have led to the erroneous conclusion that this topic did not meet WP:NF. The meager stub first brought to AFD as non-notable WAS improvable, and so has been markedly expanded and sourced. Yes, the sources are all in Italian, but that does not matter for where film notability is concerned. What does matter for determining topic notability, even for unsourced stubs, is WP:NRVE. Might the nominator consider withdrawing his easily dis-proven determination of non-notability? Thanks, Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 21:22, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.