Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The futility of the United States sanctions on Iran

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 20:03, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The futility of the United States sanctions on Iran[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This appears to be WP:Original research, or more specifically, WP:SYNTH and an essay. The sources appear primarily to support propositions that the article's creator than draws together to form their own conclusion. Singularity42 (talk) 18:33, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politics, Iran, and United States of America. Singularity42 (talk) 18:33, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It's a POV fork from the main article.Drako (talk) 18:53, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to United States sanctions against Iran#Effects and criticism: While the topic if you were to put it in a more WP:NPOV light is potentially notable, the article is a bit of a mess right now; furthermore, if this article were to be developed as a full article it should be at Effects of United States sanctions against Iran. There likely is enough to write that article, but for now a redirect seems like the best way of going about this. TartarTorte 18:54, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, highly POV fork. Don't redirect because the title itself is way too POV to be useful as a redirect. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 19:14, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Major POV issues here, title is a red flag for POV, article is not necessary in context of United States sanctions against Iran existing. Too much history for me to make a statement about relevance of WP:SPA but seems worth noting. CT55555 (talk) 22:04, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Already voted, but just a comment that redirects need not be neutral under WP:RNEUTRAL so long as WP:R#D3 doesn't apply, and I would argue that it doesn't apply here. TartarTorte 00:04, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete POV + OR. Regards, --Goldsztajn (talk) 12:26, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
If the sanctions are futile, something that I will express no opinion on, then that should be covered at the article about the sanctions rather than hived off into a separate article. Such POV-forks only preach to the already converted. Phil Bridger (talk) 20:06, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete You don't even have to read the article to know what is wrong with it. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 23:56, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Aside from all the other issues, it's got such whoppers as "The US dollar is no longer popular in the international trading [as a result of imposing sanctions]." I can't read the first reference (in Persian), but the other two (not surprisingly) don't support the claim at all. Clarityfiend (talk) 07:23, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Economics-related deletion discussions. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 04:39, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Obvious WP:POVFORK. --Yoonadue (talk) 15:50, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete pure POV NPguy (talk) 01:52, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The title violates NPOV rules. Titles should not do so.John Pack Lambert (talk) 15:21, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Obvious POV with the title.Craigwikiman (talk) 16:44, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.