Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The exchange (film) by Firdaus

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedily deleted under G3. Non-admin closure. Safiel (talk) 17:51, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The exchange (film) by Firdaus[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Independent film of questionable notability. No references, no distribution, no coverage from reliable sources, no IMDB page, no claims of notability. Contested prod. MikeWazowski (talk) 16:29, 30 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, not notable, as the entry itself makes clear: "Distribution: The film is circulated among producers' friends and network on DVD." Hairhorn (talk) 17:23, 30 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The subject is not notable. The article provides no sources to establish the subjects notability. Puffin ^{Let's talk!} 18:23, 30 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I concur with the opinions of the nominator and previous posters, non notable for reasons already given. Safiel (talk) 04:48, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 21:02, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete unsearchable, unverifiable, and total failure of WP:V and WP:NF. IMDB search shows that filmmakers have no credits for any thing, any where, at any time. And while the text of article stating "The idea of the film originally came from the director, when he purchased a camcorder with another producer, Donny Yonatan in early 2010" could maybe indicate an amateur project by unknowns, my searches for filmmakers or film name plus filmmakers [1][2][3][4][5][6] give negative results. I strongly suspect this a WP:HOAX. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 05:06, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I have nominated article for speedy deletion under A7 and possible G3. Safiel (talk) 17:47, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Wow, that was fast, I had the Speedy template up about one minute and the article was gone. Safiel (talk) 17:49, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.