Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The eurpoean penetration

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sr 13 06:55, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The eurpoean penetration[edit]

Short and pointless article. Everything contained within this already contained in other articles on the history of Africa and the slave trade. I would have redirected except that "european penetration" is so incredibly ambiguous, it could apply to anything in history having been invaded in some manner by something European. Someguy1221 18:01, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete. as per nom.--Edtropolis 18:08, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete - semi coherent, POV, inadequately referenced. Nonsense by any other name. andy 18:50, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as minimally referenced and appearing to be OR. If it's real, it needs to be rebuilt from the ground up. Tony Fox (arf!) review? 20:25, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. --Alvestrand 20:54, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete (are OR essays really CSD G1? To me they're not, they're just "poor writing"). Optionally redirect to missionary position. Or not. --Dhartung | Talk 04:53, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 09:35, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Pavel Vozenilek 15:17, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.