Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The difference between child and adult in interactive media
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 19:01, 17 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
The difference between child and adult in interactive media[edit]
the article represents a very biased view and is far from any neutrality. besides that, a lot of sentences are vague and not in grammatically correct english (e.g. "Violent games usually have strong playability" or "When they learn as play at the same time. Children are good users- they are easy to be attractive to use interactive products"). i think wikipedia is clearly misused in that article. Martinpi 16:42, 11 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:NOR. If this is some expert in the field's essay, it should be a citation in Video game, not an article. Jkelly 17:54, 11 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:NOR for now. If references to sources are given, I will change to Keep; otherwise, it's original research. Paolo Liberatore (Talk) 18:20, 11 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:NOR as above. Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] :: AfD? 18:50, 11 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as above. — Haeleth Talk 19:05, 11 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete makes no attempt to demonstrate it's anything other than one person's unresearched opinion. Durova 20:54, 11 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Original research. *drew 04:41, 16 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.