Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The chennai silks

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Both the commenting editors have suggested 'Weak Keep'ing the article. I expect the article to improve in the near future; if it does not, this current Keep closure has no prejudice against renewed AfDs in the near future. (non-admin closure) ♪ ♫ Wifione ♫ ♪ _―Œ^{♣Łeave Ξ мessage♣} 03:05, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Chennai Silks[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I almost tagged this one as a speedy A7, but it was referenced by The Hindu. However, the reference appears to be only a press release. Delete. Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 19:18, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Also nominating

Pothys (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) -- Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 19:23, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:28, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:28, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep for both. Both are leading clothing stores in Tamil Nadu and have had significant continuous coverage in Tamil media (enough to satisfy GNG). But since the coverage is not online i am qualifying the keep with a weak. Let me try and find Tamil media references for both articles. If i am able to do so, will strike the "weak".--Sodabottle (talk) 06:38, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Coverage for Pothys : [1], [2], [3], [4], [5] , [6], [7], [8]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:09, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep - The sources suggest that it is a regional chain. — C M B J 07:08, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.