Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The bunk magazine

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Big Dom 08:53, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The bunk magazine[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

From the original PROD "As per WP:CRYSTALBALL and WP:GNG". Original author deleted prod with no reason. Bluefist ^talk 20:59, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article seems to be promotional in tone, notability isn't established and it's not sourced. If these aren't fixed I say delete this. Zakhalesh (talk) 21:07, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, per WP:GNG. This is still too new to have become notable yet. Please recreate the article once the magazine is sufficiently notable that there are reliable, third party sources writing about the magazine. Pburka (talk) 21:09, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:59, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:59, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.