Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The bay horse

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedily deleted by User:Anthony Bradbury under criterion A7. (non-admin closure) • Gene93k (talk) 00:53, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The bay horse[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. Looks mildly promotional. Citrusbowler (talk) (contribs) (email me) 13:31, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note - nominated for speedy deletion under A7 by User:WilliamJE. öBrambleberry of RiverClan 13:40, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
It's a building, not a company, and the article is too short to be promotional (as there's no evidence of conflict of interest), so I don't think it's eligible for speedy deletion. I agree that it fails WP:GNG; the pub (or one with this name) existed in the 1820s and probably earlier but appears to be unremarkable. It isn't a listed building according to the English Heritage website. Peter James (talk) 14:30, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No assertion of notability. WP is not a directory. (WP is not the YP.) There are millions of business establishments in the world. The same article could be written about any of them. For instance Happys Donut Tree Too is a doughnut shop in Napa, California.cite from well-respected source. Find something notable about The Bay Horse from a secondary source and then think about an article on it. -BayShrimp (talk) 16:29, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.