Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Yellow Wallpaper (film)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. SarahStierch (talk) 00:46, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Yellow Wallpaper (film)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable film, failing both WP:N and WP:NOTFILM. Requires significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources. None provided, nor found in Google News. References listed mention film only trivially, without providing significant coverage. -- Wikipedical (talk) 21:46, 17 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:50, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:50, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Comment: There seem to be enough actual notables part of this film, that finding sources speaking toward the film should be do-able. Will be looking further before offering an opinion as to deletion. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 04:28, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Even with those links, there is no significant coverage of this film found in Google. -- Wikipedical (talk) 17:17, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Agree with "non-notable" label; I found nothing on Google, and the references provided appear to be a desperate attempt at establishing any kind of notability. Rockypedia (talk) 20:02, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Delete until or unless commentary and analysis in reliable sources is forthcoming. It was reasonable (not "desperate") to think that the involvement of notables might have attracted some press coverage, but I found none worth using. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 01:27, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:NF. Betty Logan (talk) 12:43, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.