Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Wrap LIVE (television program)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles (talk) 03:17, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Wrap LIVE (television program)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

non-notable vanispamicruftisement Chris (クリス • フィッチ) (talk) 07:32, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, non-notable TV program, the article is also written like an advertisement. Bidgee (talk) 07:49, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. —Bidgee (talk) 07:52, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I don't know if it's notable, but at any rate it's an advert. Kayau Voting IS evil 09:06, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Sounding like an advertisement isn't a reason to delete... its a reason to edit. To me, if this program is non-notable, then the entire category of Australian Community TV is not notable. In my opinion, if the show gets cancelled, then we should delete it. --Hampton (talk) 14:38, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, it is a reason to delete, that's why we have policies like WP:ADVERT. Further, statements like "if x is non-notable, then y is not notable" fall under WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS, which is not a reason to keep.--Chris (クリス • フィッチ) (talk) 02:46, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Notability not established, unlikely to be established. Advertisement. Cancellation, in fact, may lead to notability. We can but wait. Bleakcomb (talk) 01:27, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:31, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Article has been edited to read less like an advertisement. The program is naturally not as notable as shows on commercial TV, but as Community TV is not broadcasting in digital in most parts of Australia, the notability of it's program's has greatly improved. --Thewizkid93 (talk) 10:55, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Editor has a conflict of interest [1] as they are the Executive producer. Bidgee (talk) 11:23, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.