Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The World's End (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Blood and Ice Cream Trilogy. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 18:43, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The World's End[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NFF, was already deleted once in an AFD (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/The_World%27s_End), still has not begun filming. Fbifriday (talk) 01:23, 30 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

rediect to Blood and Ice Cream Trilogy fails WP:NFF Weaponbb7 (talk) 01:29, 30 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:13, 31 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete again, or Redirect to Blood and Ice Cream Trilogy. Had there been multiple new sources since its last AFD, it might have then meet the cautions at WP:CRYSTAL and WP:NFF... and I might have reconsidered my opinion as offered at the first AFD. But no... the topic stll does not have enough coverage per GNG to merit a seperate article.[1] Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 01:51, 31 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Blood and Ice Cream Trilogy as principal photography hasn't started. Cliff smith ^talk 04:07, 31 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to World's End dab page, and add a note about this particular usage. It should not redirect to the Blood and Ice Cream Trilogy, since it would lose all other meanings. 76.66.193.119 (talk) 04:43, 31 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Clearly fails WP:NFF, so either delete or redirect. I'm a little dubious about the notability of the so-called Blood and Ice Cream Trilogy though. Rob Sinden (talk) 11:42, 4 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.