Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Woodsmen
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. TonyBallioni (talk) 21:43, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
The Woodsmen[edit]
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- The Woodsmen (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unreferenced article about a series of short films, not making any strong claim to passing WP:NFILM or WP:TVSHOW. The only notability claim even really being attempted here at all is that it existed, which isn't automatically enough in the absence of media coverage about it to get it over WP:GNG -- but literally the only "source" here is the self-published website of the television channel that purportedly aired these, and absolutely no GNG-worthy coverage in media independent of the topic has proven locatable at all on a WP:BEFORE search. There's just nothing here that's "inherently" notable enough to exempt this from actually having to have had any media coverage. (Also probably conflict of interest, as it was first created by a virtual WP:SPA whose only other Wikipedia edits also pertained to the work of this series' creators.) Bearcat (talk) 19:06, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film, Television, and Canada. Bearcat (talk) 19:06, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
- Delete this unreferenced article unless an editor can find significant coverage in reliable, independent sources. Cullen328 (talk) 19:51, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.