Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Woods Band

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. The notion in the nomination that no reliable third party references are available has been countered in User:Michig's rationale, and the notion that the group fails various elements of WP:NMUSIC has also been countered by User:Michig's and User:Qwfp's rationales. (Non-administrator closure.) Northamerica1000^(talk) 15:36, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Woods Band[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of significance and no reliable third party references available Itsalleasy (talk) 18:28, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete no question it fails Wp:NMUSIC.--Jeffrd10 (talk) 18:43, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Passess WP:NMUSIC via multiple notable members and multiple significant coverage, e.g. [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8]. --Michig (talk) 21:34, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:59, 18 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:59, 18 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Meets WP:BAND#6, "Is an ensemble which contains two or more independently notable musicians", and per Michig's multiple reliable sources in Google Books. Qwfp (talk) 14:45, 18 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.