Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Wonders (channelled collective consciousness)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Anas talk? 22:20, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The Wonders (channelled collective consciousness)[edit]
- The Wonders (channelled collective consciousness) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Nonsense "collective consciousness", AfD article created as db-nonsense wasn't quite accurate but I couldn't find something better. Strong Delete as either a hoax or just nonsense. Improbcat 18:14, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete. Unreferenced, therefore nn-group. -- RHaworth 18:16, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete. Bollocks. Realkyhick 18:28, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Fails WP:ORG. "Bollocks" is, alas, not a speedy-deletion criteria (though it should be, and then we wouldn't need all of the others). MastCell Talk 20:26, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Well there is Wikipedia:Complete bollocks, but alas that is also not policy. I am delighted that you brought up WP:ORG though, I wouldn't have thought to apply that one. Improbcat 15:25, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete Non-notable, unreferenced, and badly written. — Wenli (contribs) 20:30, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Delete per nom. Not quite worth an A7, as "wider public awareness" is an assertion of notability. Not quite worth a G1, as it's at least comprehensible. But, it should go, and go quickly. Tevildo 21:18, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per all above. ¿SFGiДnts! ¿Complain! ¿Analyze! ¿Review! 23:39, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, not incomprehensible nonsense, but it is also not notable or verifiable. John Vandenberg 15:56, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.