Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Virgin Queen of St. Francis High

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. No arguments for deletion aside from the nominator. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:30, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Virgin Queen of St. Francis High[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

1. fails Wikipedia:Notability (films) 2. no indication of notability (and non-notable director) Widefox (talk) 15:43, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:56, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Keep A research in Google Books and Google News shows that the film was reviewed by Variety (see Variety's film reviews 1987-1988), Los Angeles Times (December 8, 1987: [1]), The Film journal (The Film journal: Volume 90,Editions 7-12, 1987), The Philadelphia Enquire (May 12, 1988). Enough to pass WP:NFILMS. Cavarrone (talk) 21:26, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Found same sources as above. Very obscure film, but some indepth coverage in reliable sources at the time. Tigerboy1966 22:12, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Notability is dependent upon sources being available, and not that they be in the article. Such sources have been found and offered. Notability is met. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 04:28, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.