Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Vega Brothers

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Quentin Tarantino . MBisanz ^talk 03:09, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Vega Brothers[edit]

Explicitly fails future film notability guidelines. Most of the salient data already exists on the Quentin Tarantino page. No prejudice towards recreation when reliable sources indicate that filming has already begun. Girolamo Savonarola (talk) 05:25, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. —PC78 (talk) 14:21, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. This appears to have been no more than an idea in Tarantino's head, and that looks less likely to change with each passing year. It's not something that requires it's own article, and indeed it's already covered at Quentin Tarantino. PC78 (talk) 14:26, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and merge I think projects that were seriously considered by one of the most famous directors are worth including. The article is sourced and a fine stub. Some film student or enthusiast may want to look up projects that Tarrantino wanted to do, but never finished. I see no harm in keeping it and some harm in deleting it. ChildofMidnight (talk) 18:18, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Merge/redirect into Quentin Tarantino (Or delete, since some admins treat merge/redirect votes as "keep" for some reason.) THF (talk) 18:48, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and Redirect to Quentin Tarantino. Fails WP:FILM as just a concept for a film that he had at one point. Hardly deserving of it's own article. Rwiggum (^Talk/_Contrib) 19:01, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and Redirect I agree with User:ChildofMidnight about the importance of projects considered by a famous director being worth inclusion, specially when the article is both well written and well sourced and passes WP:GNG... but if somoene is looking up information on the projects (completed, proposed, or even just considered) of Quentin Tarantino, its to HIS article where they will likely first go. Deleting the information is not even a consideration. A merge to the director's article best serves Wiki and all Wiki readers, specially since adding the information that he has now re-considered making the film, could be as simple as expanding the existing 2 sentences in the Tarantino article to include the new and sourced informations in context to his other projects. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 21:19, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Quentin Tarantino#Projects. While I agree that the projects considered by directors like QT are worth covering, I disagree that they require their own articles per WP:NFF. Most projects that do not enter production can be adequately summarized, such as in this case. More specifically, I would say to work in the Rolling Stone citation at my proposed redirected section. —Erik (talk • contrib) 15:49, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.