Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Vault (wiki)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) —Tom Morris (talk) 11:40, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Vault (wiki)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Clearly, this website is not notable and fails WP:WEB. JJ98 (Talk / Contributions) 04:35, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep There is some independent coverage cited in the article. Not much, but probably enough to clear the baseline notability standards. --Jayron32 04:45, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
It's one Wikia's most popular wikis, which has gotten independent coverage from multiple notable sources, so I don't see how it's any less notable than WoWWiki or Wookieepedia. I've added some more citations for The Vault's releases of canceled project info. Ausir (talk) 05:15, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep DavidSSabb (talk) 12:10, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Per Ausir. If the nominator is so inclined, he can bring up weak points on the talk page of the article rather than propose deletion of a legitimate and notable article. --Charitwo ^(talk) 16:25, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. —I, Jethrobot ^{drop me a line} 06:21, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) MrKIA11 (talk) 12:35, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Has an adequate amount of reliable sources. _Blake ^{(Talk·Edits)} 16:07, 1 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - I don't clearly see how it's not notable seeing the amount of references it has and traffic it gets. 98.236.11.198 (talk) 09:06, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and trout nominator. Cited sources clearly exceed WP:GNG and WP:WEB. —chaos5023 (talk) 05:13, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.