Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Tyco Guide to Ethical Conduct

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Tyco_International#Corporate_scandal_of_2002. (non-admin closure) sst ✈ 09:46, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Tyco Guide to Ethical Conduct[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An internal corporate code of ethics must fail some kind of WP:NOT, maybe WP:NOTEVERYTHING, WP:NOTMANUAL, or WP:NOTINTRANET if we had one. Curious to see what the community has to say about an article like this. I can envision a mention in Tyco International that it was implemented in the wake of the scandal, but a description of the actual contents of the code of ethics doesn't seem like a fit for an encyclopedia. Vrac (talk) 03:00, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:08, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:08, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete/redirect. Other than a brief 1-2 sentence mention in the main article at Tyco_International#Corporate_scandal_of_2002, I don't really see where we need an article for the guide itself. There are some notable code of conduct books out there, but it's exceedingly rare for them to pass guidelines as a whole because they're so standard. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 09:11, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or redirect as I found a few links at News, Books, browser and Highbeam but nothing for a better article yet. SwisterTwister talk 05:52, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.