Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Truth About Chernobyl

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. Non-admin closure. DARTH PANDA ^duel 20:11, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Truth About Chernobyl[edit]

Non-notable book. Not received notoriety or outside reviews. ScienceApologist (talk) 10:48, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The Washington Monthly review was in the article when nominated. Plenty of reviews from the best mainstream sources, as one would expect of a book on Chernobyl by the former chief engineer there.John Z (talk) 21:12, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Keep Non-trivial coverage in major media is hard to overlook. I would recommend the nominator withdraw this AfD and acknowledge that an error was made. Ecoleetage (talk) 01:55, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Keep Not quite sure why it is here, as sources exist and quick search can demonstrate this. Considering the strength of the sources, a withdraw would be in good taste. DENNIS BROWN (T) (C) 15:43, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. -- Raven1977 (talk) 20:32, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]