Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Track Burnaz

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 00:16, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Track Burnaz[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The duo exists, they do good work. They are not notable. Current sourcing consists of mere mentions, non-RS (Genius & Twitter), and a press release. Searches turned up a few mentions, but no in-depth coverage of the duo. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:37, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per nom. No evidence of WP:SIGCOV for the group. Articles don't go in-depth. JTtheOG (talk) 03:29, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.