Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Toyota Way

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 12:21, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Toyota Way[edit]

Publisher's blurb for a management book. Guy 15:27, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as vanity. It's just a content listing, and does not even try to assert notabilty.

--BrownHairedGirl ^{(talk) • (contribs)} 02:10, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Don't delete. It provides a readable and interesting summary of this common sense and highly successful way of manufacturing cars. — 62.125.91.28 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
I see no reason to delete it. The article provides an interesting glimpse into a Japanese approach to manufacturing. No harm is being done. If anything, the article should be enhanced to include additional information from other domain experts. Tschaaff 16:48, 28 October 2006 (UTC) — Tschaaff (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
Don't Delete this is a good article on lean even though this is na direct extract from a book. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.247.208.20 (talk • contribs)

Don't delete. Useful summary of a very influential book.--Stephenh 16:55, 31 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

AFD relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, KrakatoaKatie 10:40, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Wow, look. Another NN book with - wait for it - probable copyvios by the bucketload! I don't know any other way to say this but that summaries of entire books do not an article make. Oh, and it doesn't meet WP:V, either, in my eyes. --In ur base, killing ur dorfs 14:53, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Elaragirl, QuiteUnusual 21:37, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletions. -- Wwryxz 21:51, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Elaragirl. Couldn't have said it better. OfficeGirl 00:18, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Elaragirl. This is just a TOC / backflap from the book meshach 19:33, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.