Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Tortoise and the Hare (film)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete —Quarl ^(talk) 2006-12-06 08:42Z

The Tortoise and the Hare (film)[edit]

No sources to support anything, all of the information seems to be bogus (the IMDB pages for all of the people mentioned say nothing about this project). I think that this was originally supposed to be about the Aardman project called Tortoise vs. Hare (IMDB link). That film was first cancelled to make way for Wallace & Gromit: The Curse of the Were-Rabbit back in 2001, and then postponed again until Aardman's 3-film contract with Dreamworks was complete. Now that the Aardman-Dreamworks contract has been called off, the film that was supposed to be made before this one (Crood Awakening) seems to have been cancelled as well. In short, there is currently nothing to suggest that the film is being made, and the article doesn't seem to contain a single accurate thing anyway, and hasn't since its creation. This seems like a case of crystal ballism. I would normally support salvaging any article which has usefull information, but this one has no accurate information in it in any case; it shouldn't be very hard for someone to recreate it if the film actually does enter production, and nothing will be lost if it is deleted. Esn 04:44, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I'm not sure if this is a canceled project or a WP:HOAX, but there's simply no indication anywhere that Tim Burton is involved in a project like this. Fails WP:V. --Hyperbole 06:15, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, WP:HOAX, WP:V, WP:NOT a crystal ball. False information, project is merely called off, nothing ele. Ter e nc e Ong 06:42, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no sources, and no findable sources. -- Whpq 17:41, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. Sharkface217 20:27, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as WP:HOAX. FWIW, someone is claiming credit for such a hoax here. -- Shunpiker 22:55, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Next. RFerreira 02:07, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - this is a false and useless article. -- Gadgetfusion 16:58, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.