Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Time Superlation Theory
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Delete. --Fang Aili 說嗎? 22:36, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The Time Superlation Theory[edit]
Looks like original research to me. No references and google only finds this article and mirrors. Tango 21:53, 29 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete' original research, pseudoscience. —porges(talk) 22:06, 29 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Patent research or original nonsense. Bucketsofg ✐ 22:30, 29 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Wikipedia is no place for original reseach. This theory should really be shown to the scientific community and evaluated before posting here. Also, the fact that this page was written anonymously casts some doubt on this article's credibility. Akira 22:42, 29 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The lack of understanding of the widely accepted physics it's trying to debunk casts a lot of doubt on its credibility. eg. "We believe that our universe exists from millions and zillions and zillions of years. But to Whole-Time, it is just a second." The age of the universe is much debated, but I've never seen anyone suggest a value that wasn't either infinite or less than 20 billion years. --Tango 22:45, 29 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, although I'm not sure if it's more WP:OR or WP:BALLS --Deville (Talk) 05:49, 30 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as WP:OR vio. --DV8 2XL 19:46, 30 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.