Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Taj Exotica Hotel & Resort

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. TonyBallioni (talk) 15:22, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The Taj Exotica Hotel & Resort[edit]

The Taj Exotica Hotel & Resort (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable resort. DMacks (talk) 21:57, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 00:12, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy Delete The article is only one sentence long and, needless to say, fails all Wikipedia standards.TH1980 (talk) 05:16, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - Just with English language sources alone, under its previous name, the Tag Fort Aguada Beach Resort, very in-depth coverage in the 2003 book Weighing the GATS on a Development Scale: The Case of Tourism in Goa, India [1] and Vogue names this property as "arguably India’s most historic and glamorous hotel."[2] Being only one sentence is not a reason to delete an article, not less speedy delete. --Oakshade (talk) 07:13, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete The article does nothing more than provide the location/address of the business. MT TrainDiscuss 06:48, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Current article state is not a valid reason to delete an article. --Oakshade (talk) 16:17, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep A major beach resort in the Taj group. I have added sources and added it to the proper category, proper category can attract editors to make additional improvements in future. There is, I think, enough keep, not only on the page but in searches using keywords. I used: Taj + Exotica + Goa, but there are undoubtedly better keywords, and using date perimeters would also help get past the deluge of Taj coverage in gNews.E.M.Gregory (talk) 10:32, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz Humbug! 08:07, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete this is a WP:MILL hotel with WP:MILL coverage. Not all hotels are notable, and I don't see what makes this one notable. power~enwiki (π, ν) 01:14, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: I don't like repeat relistings but here's hoping for some kind of consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ad Orientem (talk) 02:52, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Changing to keep given additional coverage under the old name. This pulled the resort over my notability line. gidonb (talk) 14:13, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep I'm finding a lot of coverage of the hotel under its original name. Noted as the first major hotel development in Goa and for its proximity to the fort and covered as a significant development and resort with historic significance in the development of Goa's tourism industry. FloridaArmy (talk) 17:31, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Changing my vote to keep per availability of new information. MT TrainTalk 08:48, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/The_Taj_Exotica_Hotel_%26_Resort&oldid=1138857801"