Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Sydney Globalist

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. SarahStierch (talk) 01:29, 6 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Sydney Globalist[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No independent sources. For technical reasons, this was not included in the AfD on the network. Fails WP:GNG, hence: Delete Guillaume2303 (talk) 04:20, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: This looks like a perfectly notable academic publication to me. The publication is mentioned and implicitly sanctioned by the University of New South Wales and Edith Cowan University. It's also a member of Global21, an international network of similar publications that appears to be based at Yale. SG is frequently mentioned there. The article needs sourcing, not deletion. Faustus37 (talk) 01:17, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Our notability guidelines do not say anything about academic publications being automatically notable or that "implicit" sanctioning is an adequate source. Note also that the articles on the Global21 network and all other editions of this journal were deleted after AfDs, as mentioned in the nom. --Guillaume2303 (talk) 08:05, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 20:16, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 20:16, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 20:16, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 20:16, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

delete fails WP:GNG. trove shows hardly any sources. [1]. LibStar (talk) 02:38, 2 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.