Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Sword and the Gavel
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:21, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The Sword and the Gavel[edit]
- The Sword and the Gavel (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable book. No sources. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 02:30, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:36, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep—The book is cited by works on the Nuremberg trial,[1] among others, leading me to believe it is most likely notable and lacks only suitable sources.[2][3] It is being listed as a source in the The Egg and I article.—RJH (talk) 19:43, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:48, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —SpacemanSpiff 19:47, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply] - The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.