Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Survivors Club

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 03:14, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Survivors Club[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear to meet notability standards WP:NN. Site was launched and failed in 2009. Relaunched in 2010 with Hearst media. No pages on Wayback machine. Baed on reddit links, looks like in closed in 2011 https://www.reddit.com/domain/thesurvivorsclub.org/
The only verifiable references are: http://www.nbcnews.com/id/29805845/#.Vd40HCiA3kc (incidental mention)
http://www.prlog.org/10930504-hearst-magazines-digital-media-launches-thesurvivorscluborg-on-its-proprietary-platform.html (press release) Wiki-psyc (talk) 22:04, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2015 August 26. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 22:21, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Toffanin (talk) 10:09, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Toffanin (talk) 10:10, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:13, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:13, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately delete for now as although the article is sourced, it could be better and my searches found results mostly for the book, not the website. SwisterTwister talk 05:46, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:46, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 03:11, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for now per nom and SwisterTwister. sovereign°sentinel (contribs) 12:57, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.