Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Sunny Side of the Moon: The Best of Richard Cheese

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Richard Cheese#Discography. (non-admin closure) ASTIG😎 (ICE TICE CUBE) 17:35, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Sunny Side of the Moon: The Best of Richard Cheese[edit]

The Sunny Side of the Moon: The Best of Richard Cheese (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This entire article is sourced completely to a Billboard chart history. Not finding anything else on Google, news, newspapers. I think the band is notable, but probably not this album. —valereee (talk) 17:09, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 18:10, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • DeleteRedirect to Richard Cheese#Discography. Fails WP:NALBUM, although reaching #9 on the Billboard's Comedy chart, nobody appears to have even written about the album. Google news search leads to one (1) page, a click-bait article in Portuguese on "10 covers that prove Nirvana's songs are good in any style". Otherwise, not "enough material to warrant a reasonably detailed article": no award nominations, no sales certifications, and nothing to say about the album except to list the tracks, on top of which we say, "This album is composed primarily of songs that were on other Richard Cheese and Lounge Against the Machine albums." — JohnFromPinckney (talk / edits) 19:37, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    Agree with the two commenters below, and apologies for not paying closer attention; a redirect is what I meant and prefer. — JohnFromPinckney (talk / edits) 23:22, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect to Richard Cheese#Discography. While charting certainly helps, in this case it is necessary to acknowledge the use of "may be notable" at WP:NALBUM. This album has achieved nothing else, especially reliable and significant media coverage. Otherwise all we have is a tracklist, which is no great loss. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 14:30, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect to Richard Cheese#Discography. I do not see evidence of significant coverage from third-party, reliable sources, but I think a redirect would be more beneficial to readers than an outright deletion as this is a viable search term and a viable target article exists. Aoba47 (talk) 16:23, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Happy with a redirect as a solution. —valereee (talk) 15:31, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.