Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Stolen Wings

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 20:44, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The Stolen Wings[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article is written by the director/producer User:Tech2012 [1] who seems to use Wikipedia as their primary source of marketing. Only independent sources here are capsule reviews. Fails WP:NFILM and is probably eligible for WP:G11 given the WP:PUFFERY. – FenixFeather ^{(talk)(Contribs)} 17:08, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:03, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:03, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Does not go anywhere near meeting WP:NFILM. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:53, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Fails WP:NFILM. Spleodrach (talk) 15:14, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I searched and what I found was pretty much just primary sources and content released through WP:SPS that wouldn't be considered reliable on Wikipedia. The only outlets that seem to have reviewed the film are blog-type websites. ReaderofthePack (｡◕‿◕｡) 20:55, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.