Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Stagg Party

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. So Why 10:57, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The Stagg Party[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Web series about non-notable, erotica photographer. Single somewhat significant mention in sources is a self-penned text in the Huffington Post blog. External links take reader to personal-work websites. The whole affair is simply promotional work. The Gnome (talk) 10:33, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Popular culture-related deletion discussions. Rayman60 (talk) 10:55, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Rayman60 (talk) 10:55, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Rayman60 (talk) 10:56, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 20:59, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - lack of significant coverage. PhilKnight (talk) 21:44, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Has not received sufficient coverage in RS. Fails GNG and WP:NTV. Hrodvarsson (talk) 00:20, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.