Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Spiritual divinity of Indian life

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  15:40, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Spiritual divinity of Indian life[edit]

The Spiritual divinity of Indian life (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable book, does not appear to meet WP:GNG or WP:BK. I could not find any coverage or reviews in secondary sources. CataracticPlanets (talk) 02:38, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 09:42, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 09:42, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, - TheMagnificentist 12:22, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:10, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: A WP:SPA article on a book. Despite inside-cover text which indicates publication by OUP (apparently without normal proof-checking, for example "Avinash Patra has asserted his right under the University of Oxford press Copyright, Designs and World-class Family Act 2010..." and "This Article is belong realist work on The Spiritual Life ..."), Amazon indicates it to be published via CreateSpace. I am seeing no evidence of attained notability. Fails WP:NBOOK, WP:GNG. AllyD (talk) 10:01, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.