Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The South Shore Standard

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:28, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The South Shore Standard[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Founded in March 2011. Fails WP:GNG, WP:NMEDIA Taroaldo (talk) 22:17, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete I don't even see a claim of notability. A7. Dennis Brown (talk) 23:30, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
It is not eligible for speedy delete because it is not in one of the required categories: people organisations or web content. So if you want to definitively delete it vote for non speedy delete. For any real newspaper I would like to see an article here about it, but this is very recent and unproved by any reference. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:10, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News-related deletion discussions. —• Gene93k (talk) 20:32, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:33, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Agree that it fails GNG. ScottyBerg (talk) 02:00, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.