Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Shrinking of Treehorn

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. Synergy 16:10, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Shrinking of Treehorn[edit]

These books do not appear to be notable because I can't any reliable sources that show it's notability. Schuym1 (talk) 03:45, 17 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, at least until someone's had a chance to go properly looking for notable sources. Failing that, Merge into a more suitable article. I read this most excellent story as a child, and this article [1] suggests that it's a lot more than your average vanity or fancruft article. Chris Neville-Smith (talk) 09:12, 17 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep "The Shrinking of Treehorn" According to The Continuum Encyclopedia of Children's Literature, the book won a 1971 New York Times Best Illustrated Books of the year award, and the American Library Association cited it as a notable book ([2], page 326). I've found a Milwaukee Journal Sentinel article ([3]) which seems to be about the event in the article Chris cites. I've found some book sources ([4] pages 88-89, [5] page 223-226, [6] page 161 and possibly 162-164), that address some of the themes in Shrinking. Overall a google books search gets 173 hits, although some are the book itself. There are also 32 google scholar hits. I think all this suggests that "The Shrinking of Treehorn" is notable, although I haven't really looked for Treehorn's treasure. There are probably more sources out there. Silverfish (talk) 18:16, 17 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, per the first citation from Silverfish. Stifle (talk) 14:23, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The sources found by Silverfish do an ample job of showing notability. Edward321 (talk) 23:31, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 22:23, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.