Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Shopmodern Condition

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JohnCD (talk) 13:43, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Shopmodern Condition[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I found three hits on Google for this exact term, with two coming from Wikipedia. I suspect it is made up like Aesthetonomics. Rob (talk) 06:33, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Only ever appears in the work of one non-notable person. Antrocent (♫♬) 08:44, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. as per WP:GNG. Author is trying try to connect both The Shopmodern Condition and Aesthetonomics (containing only the description of coined term being used by Swedish). Both have no-independent sources A.Minkowiski^{_Lets t@lk} 08:56, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, article promoting a non-notable neologism.TheLongTone (talk) 14:33, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:24, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.