Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Saturdays: 24/7

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to The Saturdays. Content may be merged at editorial discretion. Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 00:58, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Saturdays: 24/7[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication this reality series has yet recieved significant coverage in reliable third party sources Active Banana ( ^bananaphone 20:50, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

support redirect, this isnt notable or remarkable. Just follows the daily lives of the saturdays. -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 | talk2me 20:59, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

keep- The television series is not just a one night special or on a smaller network, to the contrary, it's actually on large network and has multiple parts. The series is significant and relevant as it is being aired at a time when the group is reaching near the top of the charts with both an album and a single and the series documents the times leading up to this. I would support the entire article in it's current format being merged but only after the series has aired in full and if at that time sources are still lacking.--Ckelly987 (talk) 22:43, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

And can you provide significant coverage in reliable third party sources about the show? Until you can, it doesnt matter how many episode there are, it fails WP:N. If in the future this coverage does become available, then the article can be a stand alone.Active Banana ( ^bananaphone 14:34, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:31, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and redirect to The Saturdays as it is a very new show and there is simply not enough information for a standalone article. Article can be recreated if there are more information. Armbrust ^Talk _Contribs 09:55, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The artical should be kept. I agree with Ckelly987, it's not asif the program is on a small network. I will support a redirect after the whole show is finished airing, and still lacking ref's. But The Saturdays: 24/7 is not the only one, Jedward: Let Loose and Girls Aloud: Off The Record, if it is not noble enough for just following The Saturdays daily lives... How are they? --SitDownOnIt (talk) 10:36, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment, are you seriously trying to compare Girls Aloud: Off The Record with The Saturdaus: 24/7? Off the Record followed Girls Aloud whilst they all embarked on seperate projects. 24/7 mainly consists of just trivial fan-cruft and follows their daily lives as a recording group (artist). Per WP:Other things exist don't use other articles as examples for what should or shouldn't exist unless there's discernable similarity. For what it's worth I've also nominated Jedward: Let Loose for deletion. -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 | talk2me 16:18, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WP:CRYSTAL we do not keep an unsupported article on the basis that "third party sources about it may show up sometime in the future." If there are no sources now, there is no article now. If sources show up in the future, then we have a stand alone article. Active Banana ( ^bananaphone 16:12, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

redirect - to the group. Off2riorob (talk) 00:20, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.