Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Sand Canyon Review (Magazine)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 13:48, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The Sand Canyon Review (Magazine)[edit]
- The Sand Canyon Review (Magazine) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- Delete. Non-notable student magazine. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 21:19, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note. Notable College Magazine. -- The page in question has been nominated for deletion; though it should be made mention that other student/campus produced magazines have wiki pages as well - The Pacific Review, to make mention of one such magazine. Pacific Review Pacific Review It also should be noted that The Sand Canyon Review has hosted work by several artists of the written word and as well as those in the visual arena. If any changes are need to keep this wiki page going, they will be made. Please understand that during the creation of this page, it was made with the best intend to showcase one of the programs from this college campus. Craftonstudent (talk) 15:52, 13 December 2009 (UTC)CraftonStudent[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 03:39, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete not notable at all, extremely unlikely any reliable sources exist. Rather telling that there's not a single Google News hit, even in the archives. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 18:44, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom and Starblind DRosin (talk) 21:57, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.