Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Royal Stampede (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 21:39, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Royal Stampede[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails GNG, poorly written Hawkeye75 (talk) 02:54, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Unless there is some definitive bar where "x number of views makes you notable enough for your own WP page," i don't see how this page passes WP:GNG. Comatmebro User talk:Comatmebro 03:04, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 03:17, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Search for "Royal Stampede", definitely notable, they have also played in Tiësto's Music Video "On My Way". Mjbmr (talk) 14:23, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- an unremarkable YouTuber; sources are tabloid-like. Being in one music video is an insufficient claim to notability. K.e.coffman (talk) 18:13, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 18:14, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 18:14, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral - It looks like it's Youtuber open season this week. This particular article isn't an advert, is reasonably written and sourced. A source check does show some coverage from reliable sources (of the group and their pranks) - but it looks to me borderline in quantity.Icewhiz (talk) 19:17, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Juliancolton | ^Talk 15:00, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:CORPDEPTH. The *primary* subject matter in the listed sources in all cases is the prank or routine or song, *not* the company. -- HighKing⁺⁺ 14:40, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.