Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Revere

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Phillips Academy. Eddie891 Talk Work 23:58, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Revere[edit]

The Revere (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable high school newspaper. Not even close to passing WP:GNG. Onel5969 TT me 12:34, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 13:01, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 13:02, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete I was going to nominate this myself but got sidetracked. It's kind of ironic that there are all these debates about whether secondary schools are notable, and here we have an article on the student rag of one! Completely non-notable, IMHO (and the same probably goes for their other title The Phillipian, as well). No secondary sources cited and none that I could find, either. --DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:23, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect to Phillips Academy (or the clubs section of the page once it's created), or if there's some other publication with the same name, just delete. It is worth noting that this isn't just a run-of-the-mill high school, but rather one that receives quite a lot more media attention by virtue of its prestige and history. Its main student newspaper, The Phillipian, is 160 years old and looks fine. This paper, on the other hand, was only founded in 2017, and a quick search turned up nothing that'd establish GNG or even the more lenient WP:NMEDIA. {{u|Sdkb}}talk 15:55, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per WP:GNG. None of the cited sources that discuss this publication are independent sources. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 19:26, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:26, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.