Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Reformation G.D.N.I.A.F.T

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Bishop Lamont. (non-admin closure)UY Scuti Talk 18:42, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Reformation G.D.N.I.A.F.T[edit]

The Reformation G.D.N.I.A.F.T (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

début album, just a track list Jimfbleak (talk) 05:52, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 11:54, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 11:54, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 11:54, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect to Bishop Lamont. Being a debut album (if it could really be considered as such given his other releases) is not a reason for deletion. There's a little more here than a tracklist, but I'm not finding sufficient coverage to justify an article at this time. The best I've found is [1], [2], and this which may relate to a previous version of the album. --Michig (talk) 06:58, 24 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:35, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • redirect for now, revisit the idea in a month or two to determine if we should delete or if a full article could be written.Kellymoat (talk) 16:53, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.