Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Prodigy's fifth studio album

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. PhilKnight (talk) 13:30, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Prodigy's fifth studio album[edit]

Article fails WP:HAMMER. Sceptre ^(talk) 09:37, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - per WP:CRYSTAL and WP:HAMMER and nom.--S_RX 12:49, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:CRYSTAL and WP:HAMMER. Edison (talk) 17:13, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per the ever-popular WP:HAMMER. We don't even know the title yet , so almost nothing is verifiable. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells• Otter chirps • HELP!)} 18:40, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:HAMMER & WP:CRYSTAL. Esradekan Gibb ^"Talk" 02:09, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:HAMMER & WP:CRYSTAL. I've been babysitting this article for a while. When I first found it, it was in a sorry state. Even with all the crud removed, it still contains almost no substance. dejaphoenix (talk) 23:16, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Move to a subsection of The Prodigy or its Talk page, because although it fails WP:HAMMER and WP:CRYSTAL this information, as updated pending announcement of the title, will be useful in a proper article. Julyo (talk) 12:05, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The article fails to give third party reliable sources. Also fails WP:V, WP:CBALL. --Kanonkas : Talk 14:05, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.