Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Pro Notes

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 16:10, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Pro Notes[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Reviewed as a part of new article review process. No wp:notability. Zero mention much less coverage in independent sources. One reference is to the creator's website, the other is a dead link to a website that apparently previously had a post on it. Found nothing independent in a source search. North8000 (talk) 12:08, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. ~ Amkgp 💬 13:03, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. ~ Amkgp 💬 13:03, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nepal-related deletion discussions. ~ Amkgp 💬 13:03, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: First reference is a personal website; second is a promo website and its broken. nirmal (talk) 09:42, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.